Statistics Claim Check

Appendix F companion • Read dashboard and AI claims before you communicate or act

Companion to Appendix F: Reading Statistical Claims in Defensible Analytics. Use this page when a dashboard, AI visual, or chat answer makes a claim about an average, a group difference, a relationship, or a driver.

This is not a formal-inference course. It does not teach hypothesis testing, regression fitting, p-value calculation, forecasting, or model selection. It helps you decide whether a claim is ready to communicate, needs more checking, or needs qualified method review before a consequential decision.

Start with the claim

Before accepting a number, name the boundaries that make it meaningful.

Choose the next move

Decision state When it fits Next move
Communicate a bounded description Unit, population, denominator, comparison, and material limitation are clear. State what the data shows and name the boundary.
Investigate before acting An outlier, subgroup, alternate filter, or plausible confounder could change the story. Check the distribution, a finer grain, or a focused comparison.
Seek qualified method review A consequential decision depends on an interval, significance claim, ANOVA, or model output. Review the method, assumptions, and decision consequence with a qualified analyst.

Read, do not overclaim

Practice workbook

Open the workbook in Excel, Excel for the web, or Google Sheets. The formulas are visible so you can inspect the claim, then return here to choose the next check.

Try this claim check

A support dashboard says: “Tier 2 resolution time rose 34%, so staffing is the cause.”

  1. Identify the unit, population, denominator, comparison, and grain.
  2. Open the workbook’s Kenji Raw Data and Descriptive Claims sheets. Check whether the average conceals a small number of incident-heavy months.
  3. Ask what else changed: ticket mix, identity-release timing, incident severity, or staffing.
  4. Rewrite the claim as a bounded description and name the next check before recommending any staffing action.

Go deeper

When a decision requires formal study beyond Appendix F, use an authoritative resource rather than extending a dashboard calculation beyond its evidence.

Resource Printed URL Purpose
OpenIntro Statistics https://www.openintro.org/book/os/ Free textbook, data, and exercises for formal study.
Penn State STAT 200 https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat200/ Open notes for statistical methods beyond this companion’s scope.
NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/ Public reference for exploration, measurement, modeling, monitoring, and comparison.
Practical Statistics for Data Scientists https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/practical-statistics-for/9781492072935/ Applied bridge for analysts who need more depth on sampling, significance, regression, and misuse.

Related book resources